Fintech slams aggregator “monopoly”

In a submission to the government, the firm claims “powerful mortgage groups” have colluded to stop it from entering the market

Fintech slams aggregator “monopoly”

News

By

A heated statement by emerging fintech Hero BroKer has accused major aggregator groups of working together and stacking the deck against newcomers to the industry.

In a submission to the Productivity Commission’s Inquiry into Competition in Australia's Financial System released last Wednesday (27 September), Clint Howen, founder of Hero BroKer, called upon the commission to examine the role that aggregators play in the market.

He recounted his experiences with the major aggregator groups, claiming that Hero BroKer was denied entry into the market despite meeting the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) compliance regulations. He claimed that there was a “collective discussion” between key figures within the mortgage industry to protect themselves.

“We at Hero BroKer have operated in a compliant and legal manner, and this is recognised by ASIC. However, our competitive edge was prevented from entering the market from powerful mortgage groups,” Bowen wrote.

While first being welcomed by AFG, Bowen said the aggregator made an about-face and eventually terminated its contract with the fintech. Other aggregator groups later said they had been “told not to work” with Hero BroKer.

In response to Australian Broker's request for comment, an AFG spokesperson said the aggregator “decided that Hero BroKer’s business model did not align with our own and we did not wish to work with Hero Broker.”

“There is no aggregator conspiracy and AFG wishes Hero BroKer well in their business endeavours,” the spokesperson said.

Bowen suggested otherwise in his submission, claiming that aggregators were using their power within the industry to reach beyond their purview of providing a service and were instead "actively shutting down" newcomers who they perceived as a threat.

“The Hero BroKer experience to date has seen aggregators behaving like a monopoly, with a collective control of more than 50% of the market,” he wrote.

“This isn't in the name of competition and to offer better services to Australians, but instead to their detriment, thus potentially costing Australians billions of dollars.”

He concluded by requesting the assistance of the Productivity Commission to “build the industry fairer and better in service of everyday Australians".

Related stories:

Fintech to help consumers be their own broker

Heat turns up on bank-owned aggregators

Shadow banks inflating apartment risks

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!